Which fallacy is committed in the following statement:
“Tarun cannot be guilty of murder since there is no way Tarun could kill someone.”

The correct option is Begging the Question.

Detailed Explanation:
The fallacy of Begging the Question (also known as circular reasoning or petitio principii) occurs when an argument's premises assume the truth of the conclusion they are trying to prove, rather than offering independent evidence to support it.

In the given statement:
1. Conclusion: Tarun cannot be guilty of murder.
2. Premise: There is no way Tarun could kill someone.

By definition, murder involves the act of killing someone. Therefore, saying Tarun is incapable of killing someone is simply restating that Tarun cannot be guilty of murder in different words. The premise assumes the truth of the conclusion without providing any external evidence or logical reasons showing why Tarun could not kill someone. Because the argument circularity relies on its own conclusion as a premise, it commits the fallacy of begging the question.