Question Details

Let us define a relation R in R as aRb if a ≥ b. Then R is

Options

A

an equivalence relation

B

reflexive, transitive but not symmetric

C

neither transitive nor reflexive but symmetric

D

symmetric, transitive but not reflexive

Correct Answer :

reflexive, transitive but not symmetric

Solution :

The correct option is "reflexive, transitive but not symmetric".

Let us analyze the given relation R defined on the set of real numbers R as:
aRb  if and only if  ab

To determine the nature of the relation, we test it for three properties: reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity.

1. Reflexivity:
A relation R on a set R is reflexive if for every element aR, we have aRa.
According to the definition of the relation, aRa means:
aa
Since any real number is always equal to itself, the inequality aa is mathematically true for all aR.
Therefore, the relation R is reflexive.

2. Symmetry:
A relation R on a set R is symmetric if aRb implies bRa for all a,bR.
Let us test this with an example. Suppose a=5 and b=3:
Since 53, we have 5R3.
However, 35 is false, which means 3R5 does not hold true.
Since aRb does not guarantee bRa, the relation R is not symmetric.

3. Transitivity:
A relation R on a set R is transitive if whenever aRb and bRc, then we must also have aRc for all a,b,cR.
Assume aRb and bRc. This gives us two inequalities:
ab and bc
Combining these two inequalities, we get:
abcac
This satisfies the definition aRc.
Therefore, the relation R is transitive.

Combining our findings, the relation R is reflexive, transitive but not symmetric.

Unlock Our Free Library

Access expert-curated educational resources and study materials—completely free.

Discover more resources

You may also like

Mock Tests

View All
  • JEE
  • intermediate
  • 3 hours
  • chemistry, mathematics, physics

  • JEE
  • intermediate
  • 3 hours
  • chemical engineering, mathematics, physics